With a cost of living crisis driving expenses up across Europe, people are understandably looking to save money wherever they can.
Landscape professionals aren’t exempt, and naturally are looking to lower running costs for their businesses. An area that is often seen as a potential money-saver is replacement parts, with the cheaper aftermarket parts seemingly providing a cost-effective solution.
They are, however, not made to the same standard, and using aftermarket parts can have some nasty consequences for your engine incurring costs that far outstrip the initial price difference between parts. The difference in quality between Kawasaki Engines genuine parts and non-genuine parts is often vast, and can impact everything from engine life to the amount of oil and fuel you need to use.
We take a closer look and compare the parts, pinpointing what it is that makes genuine parts superior, and the potential consequences of using an aftermarket alternative.
Genuine vs aftermarket parts
Not all aftermarket parts are the same, and that in itself is part of the problem. Some aftermarket parts may perform adequately, others could fail immediately: it’s a risk that you take every time you purchase a non-genuine part – there’s no guarantees.
To help you understand what makes them different, we’ve investigated the most frequently replaced and critical engine parts: the filters.
We’ve put a genuine Kawasaki part in a side-by-side comparison with an aftermarket part so you can see the difference for yourself.
Oil filter
One of the most commonly replaced parts is also the most critical. If the oil filter fails, the engine fails. Generally, non-genuine oil filters will not remove as much combustion contamination, shortening the engine life.
In the below image, the genuine part is on the left, and a non-genuine part is on the right. This aftermarket oil filter was from a reputable supplier, but you can still see clear differences between the two.